Skip to main content

Table 2 Data on sprinkler head reliability

From: A review of sprinkler system effectiveness studies

Description

Source

Unit

Minimum

Mean

Maximum

Removal

(Watanabe 1979)

per demand

 

3.0 × 10 -6

 

Deformation

(Watanabe 1979)

per demand

 

4.61 × 10 -4

 

Leakage

(Watanabe 1979)

per demand

 

3.36 × 10 -4

 

Obstruction (heat and water)

(Watanabe 1979)

per demand

 

1.467 × 10 -3

 

Partition rearrangement

(Watanabe 1979)

per demand

 

4.89 × 10 -4

 

Paint loading

(Watanabe 1979)

per demand

 

6.5 × 10 -5

 

Failure

(Moinuddin et al. 2009)

per demand

 

7.82 × 10 -2

 

Fire detectors fail to function

(Moelling et al. 1980)

per demand

1.99 × 10 -3

2.97 × 10 -3

4.45 × 10 -3

Fail to open

(Moelling et al. 1980)

per demand

 

1.00 × 10 -6

 

Failure

(Ronty and Keski-Rahkonen 2004)

failures/year

1.50 × 10 -4

1.70 × 10 -4

1.80 × 10 -4

Sprinkler installation

(Ronty and Keski-Rahkonen 2004)

failures/year

8.0 × 10 -3

1.1 × 10 -2

1.4 × 10 -2

New (fail dangerous)

(Nash and Young 1991)

failures/year

 

3.10 × 10 -2

 

Old (fail dangerous)

(Nash and Young 1991)

failures/year

 

5.10 × 10 -2

 

Failure to flow water

(Finucane and Pinkney 1988)

failures/year

 

2.0 × 10 -2

 

Water released but

(Finucane and Pinkney 1988)

failures/year

 

8.0 × 10 -2

 

not in intended pattern

    Â